According to Bloomberg,OpenAI Court documents were filed in a San Francisco, California court on Monday local time, challenging the previous Elon...MuskA blistering attack on its allegations:The allegation is based on "incoherent and incoherent" factual premises..
Musk announced last month that he was suing OpenAI, its CEO Altman, and its president Greg Brockman, claiming that OpenAI had deviated from its original mission of "building responsible artificial intelligence" and had become a de facto subsidiary of its largest investor, Microsoft.It's important to note that this OpenAI filing is the company's first legal response to Musk's lawsuit.
In its filing, OpenAI emphasized that it had not violated its agreement with Musk, as "There is no founding agreement or any agreement at all with Musk, as the complaint itself makes clear.”
In court documents, OpenAI said, "Musk seeks compensation that is as unconscionable as his claims... Musk seeks an order that theForcing OpenAI to reorganize and distribute its technology under the terms of his fictitious contracts. "
OpenAI also asked the court to designate the lawsuit as a "complex case," which, under Cal.This is to avoid unnecessary burdens on the courts and the parties concerned.. Cases are assigned to specially designated judges when they involve complex technical issues, multiple parties and numerous claims.
OpenAI had sent a memo to its employees refuting Musk's allegations and offering an alternative explanation for why it filed the lawsuit, and on March 6, OpenAI issued another lengthy article, "TheOpenAI and Elon Musk", explaining the relationship between OpenAI and Musk, and why Musk eventually left.