according toCCTVNews reported on Feb. 16 that from spoofing entrepreneur Lei Jun to AI The production of Dr. Zhang Wenhong's audio and video to bring goods for himself, and there are even unscrupulous elements who use AI deep synthesized video to carry out fraud. Over the past year, the phenomenon of AI deep synthesized audio and video infringement has intensified.
Previously there were netizens who had used AI-produced Andy Lau's voice to gain traffic for themselves, and Andy Lau Films also issued an urgent statement to remind netizens not to fall into the AI voice synthesis technology scam of faking Andy Lau's voice.
Reporter investigation found that the realization of AI deep synthesis of audio and video is not difficult, and even in some shopping platforms.AI deep compositing technology has become a profit-making tool for many online stores, which can customize AI deep compositing of celebrity audio and video for just a few tens of dollars.
1AI learned from the report that the depth synthesis software is not difficult to download in the network, and there are dozens of open source software and tools to realize the voice change and face change. Although there is a certain technical threshold due to the need to adjust the parameters and many steps, many anchors on short video platforms are teaching.
Experts said that the relevant laws and regulations clearly stipulate that, without authorization, shall not be depth synthesis production and publication of other people's information.Online stores take orders for AI deep compositing to produce celebrity videos, which is already a copyright infringementand should be held legally responsible.
In judicial practice.The country has concluded the first case of infringement of personality rights of AI-generated sound.. In this case, the plaintiff, as a voice actor, had his voice generated by an AI and sold to the public without authorization. The court held that China's civil code has already, in the personality rights section, regarded the voice of a natural person as a kind of personality right and interest, with personal exclusivity. Therefore, the court finally found that the defendant's behavior constituted infringement.
