U.K.Allow judges to useChatGPTwriteLegal ruling, and released an official guide. The guide details the correct use of ChatGPT, potential risks and examples, and is applicable to all officials and employees of judicial institutions. This move marks the recognition of generative AI in the judicial field, and the guide will be continuously improved.
As early as September 16 this year, Lord Colin Birss, a well-known British Lord of Appeal, used ChatGPT to summarize some legal rulings at an event of the British Law Society. Although Lord Colin Birss said that ChatGPT is very useful, he also emphasized that when using generative AI such as ChatGPT, care should be taken to avoid processing or generating unknown content, as well as using specific legal data for fine-tuning.authorityGenerative AI products.
Official guidance address: https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/artificial-intelligence-ai-judicial-guidance/
The release of this guide is an important step in the application of generative AI in the judicial field. The official guide details the correct way to use ChatGPT, warns of potential risks, and provides examples. The British judicial department will update the guide in real time based on actual usage and invite relevant departments to make suggestions. This move marks the recognition of generative AI in the judicial field and shows that this guide will continue to be improved in the future.
Lord Colin Birss shared his experience using ChatGPT, emphasizing its convenience in writing judgments. However, the article also pointed out that when using generative AI such as ChatGPT, care should be taken to avoid processing or generating unknown content, and suggested using specific legal data to fine-tune theauthorityGenerative AI products. The guide also lists a series of precautions to help judicial workers use generative AI correctly and remind them not to rely too much on public generative AI products.
The guidelines emphasize the need for caution in using generative AI such as ChatGPT, and remind judicial practitioners to understand its functions and potential limitations. The guidelines also warn that public generative AI may not provideauthorityThe answers from the database may not be accurate.mostDo not use it in the final judgment. At the same time, the guide also reminds you to distinguish the legal differences in different regions to avoid problems.